DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
COURTHOUSE RO
ARLINGTON. V4
Cc NC 1D 18
at mr en+ anwawIs rm + ~ ee = 3
cation for correctiol JL LL
c fy mac 155
2 + Wok = <
concurred
Accordingly, and
votes or t
request.
Te te a =
Chat
B
evidence within one
=
is important to keep
Docket No. NR6795-14
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden i
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
sf st \ «# “a
Wh hiv
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Pyecutive Director
Enclosure: CNRC memo 1133 Ser N323 of 17 Nov 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5676 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Te 100 701 S GOURTHOUSE ROAL. in this regara, is important to keep in mind that a presumption attaches to all official records Consequently Docket No. NR5676-14 for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1885 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ef your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC Memo 5420 Ser N1/c537 of 14 May 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden 15 0 existence of probable materia Enclosure: Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8513 13
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 97920 Ser N130D2/14U0900 of 9 Jul 14, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. NR8513-13 n the applicant te demonstrate the naval record, the burden is o 1 error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7241 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 5 June 2014, a copy of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4201 14
“pocumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, requiations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser Ni30C/14U1201 dated 11 September 2014, a COpy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8921 13
NR8921-13 te tates oe Te ee to your application for correction of your naval This is in referen 0 uSC 1552. . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2407 14
Documentary material considered by the Board congisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also notes that you have applied for 4 correction to your record for an error that allegedly occurred more than 25 years ago- Under the rules governing this Board, an application for a correction of a naval record must be made within three years after the discovery of the alleged...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7631 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8208 14
You again requested removal of the fitness report for 3 June to 2 September 2011. In your previous case, docket number 1076-12, this ~equest was denied on 26 April 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, the Board's file on your previous case, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies..
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8005 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to correct orders from Permanent Change of Station (PCS} Orders te active Duty for Training (ADT) Orders. The Board, consisting of Mr. fxnicios, Mr. Ivins and Mr. Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...